Welcome to European-American
University
You are not Logged in! Log
in here.
European-American
University™
Education beyond boundaries :: Distance Learning Degrees
Home
> Alcott Center for Educational
Research >Buckingham and elsewhere
Buckingham and
elsewhere - some
viewpoints from the U.K.
by John Kersey
Forty years ago, British universities regulated themselves in a culture of independence. Government was prohibited by a Treasury minute from interfering with the administration of the universities, which were regarded as sovereign institutions, and such government bodies as there were (including the University Grants Commission, which was founded in 1889) were generally remote and strictly non-interventionist. Academic standards were regarded as a matter of common agreement between institutions, largely maintained by means of external examining. Reading statist material on the universities now, one would never imagine that the stifling web of university regulation was such a relatively modern encumbrance. Those who wish to destroy institutions begin with the re-writing of their history.
The increasing dominance of the authoritarian Left and the negligent concentration of the free-market Right on areas other than education has allowed the ties between state and universities to become a stranglehold. Not only this, but statist academics have effectively ensured that their ideas now dominate the academic agenda and that academic appointments are largely restricted to those who support that agenda. That post-war period saw an expansion in university provision; in 1992 this was to be further augmented. More universities may not have resulted in a lowering of standards, but more universities certainly did not mean an increased variety or an increased choice. Rather, expansion led to ever more oppressive centralisation. The coming of the Research Assessment Exercise standardised postgraduate education to little more than a tick-box procedure whose blandness insults genuine innovation and subjects every subject to explicitly political strictures.
Kenneth Minogue, writing in “Buckingham at 25” has this to say in summing up the position:
The extent to which this situation has taken hold is perhaps witnessed by the overwhelming decline in media-visible academics who espouse a free-market or libertarian philosophy in the UK. Talking in general terms, there are now a few areas of the university where those views are still acceptable and whole swathes of subject-matter where they are not. The study of English, Music, Media Studies, Sociology, Education and the humanities in general is subject in many institutions to an overwhelming authoritarian-left bias so pervasive that it has become a Gramscian hegemony – and therefore by nature seen as “common sense” and “natural”. Also implicit in this definition is the fact that the academics concerned have cheerfully fastened the millstone around their own necks. Nowell-Smith’s definition of common sense comes strongly to mind; “the way a subordinate class lives its subordination.”
The objectives of the ruling class in education, at least as far as the UK is concerned, is to promote social engineering and to ensure that the ideas of the authoritarian-left gain such hold that they are accepted as givens (as explained above). Right-wing intellectuals, as well as libertarians of all shades are marginalised and increasingly find the modern university an impossible place in which to work. The most prominent of Thatcher’s historians, Norman Stone, left his chair at Oxford for the relative obscurity of Turkey’s Bilkent University. There are some exceptions, but in the area of education, there are only really two places among all of Britain’s universities where the teaching of education is separated from the process of the inculcation of authoritarian-leftist and statist propaganda. Those two places are the private University of Buckingham
In this last, you can see a very clear connexion with the ideas and concepts of non-traditional education, and notably this concept of “uncontrolled” education is now being conceived as a major conceptual threat to mainstream education, both in ideology and in that it threatens the control of the university and thus of the ruling class. There are further interesting case-studies in this area in South Korea
The leading text that promoted the concept of the independent university in the UK was Harry S. Ferns “Towards an Independent University”
Increasingly the elite among British universities have argued for independence from government control as far as quality assurance is concerned. Tooley, writing in “Buckingham at 25
In “Freeing the Universities from State Control”
This leads to the perhaps inevitable citation of Germany under National Socialism as an example of the corruption of university independence through unprincipled state control.
Beyond Buckingham, a similar and equally-revealing point is made by education writer John Clare in his response below,
A: That is certainly the joint view of UCAS, the university admissions service, and the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA), which claim to be "the experts on standards and quality". They have just published a self-serving little booklet, "How do I find the best course for me?", which strives to give the impression that one university is just as good as another and all that sets them apart is their "reputation in the public psyche". It even has the nerve to cast doubt on the usefulness of research excellence as a guide to quality, on the grounds that the assessments were completed in 2001 and "as you can imagine, some of the information is getting a bit out of date". In the next breath, it urges pupils to consult the QAA's reports, most of which were published before 2001 and some of which go back to 1993.
[Source: “Any questions”, The Telegraph, 29 June 2005: formerly available via free login at www.telegraph.co.uk]
We also come on to this keynote statement by Jacomb:
The whole work is of considerable interest in putting forward arguments and historical perspectives on the concept of universities that are private in the sense of their private ownership and freedom from government regulation. In particular the Academic and Economic Agendas described in the section on the history of Buckingham are noteworthy.
Here the conflict between those agendas is described (p 205):
Although Buckingham is a non-profit organisation, a favourable view is nonetheless taken of for-profit universities in principle and practise.
Further in the same symposium, Alan Peacock comments on the pre-charter existence of Buckingham, when the university college (as it then was) was a private limited company:
Peacock also has some interesting comments to make on distance education.
It should be pointed out that Buckingham succeeded in gaining recognition where Britain’s other private universities failed, largely because of its connexions with the ruling class. Margaret Thatcher, then Prime Minister, was one of the key figures in Buckingham’s governance and support. Other private institutions fell victim to the Education Reform Act 1988 that was essentially an anti-competitive measure designed to shore up the market for the academic establishment, suffering as a result of a lack of ruling-class backing. There was no significant attempt to assess those private providers to determine what quality of education was being supplied; simply a blanket ban on all of them bar Buckingham.
I have dealt with Buckingham enough here hopefully to make a convincing case that in its whole outlook it provides a single-institution revolt against the state-controlled model of education elsewhere.
In conclusion, I would perhaps do well to point to an article that, whilst it concerns the school rather than university system, has much of relevance to add to the debate: Sean Gabb's “Less is Good, Nothing is Better; How the State can Improve British Education”
I hope that this brief survey has made clear that beneath that surface is a good deal of support for those ideas from diverse locations, and the beginnings of an essentially libertarian movement to reclaim the traditional virtues of a liberal education from those whose response is essentially one of the reduction of that concept to one of state-servitude and subjugation.
One final point is that this cycle is not new, although it is taking a new form. In the eighteenth-century the British universities went through a decline that led to the significant developments of the day taking place outside of their walls. Again I believe we are seeing this. The without-walls of our day are the users of the Internet, and the next model of education that comes forward will encompass and respond wholeheartedly to the web as educational medium and knowledge supplier.
Author's note: This article began as a request for such a survey from Australian educational consultant George Brown, to whom I am grateful for the opportunity to clarify my thoughts on the matters concerned.
EAU Site Navigation
Programs :: About EAU :: Application :: FAQs :: Tuition/Fees :: News :: Affiliations :: Accreditation :: Administration :: Faculty :: Policies :: Virtual Library :: Alumni :: Contact Us :: Corporate Services :: Merchandise :: Home
David
Ricardo School of Business
Programs at the bachelor's, M.B.A. and doctoral levels entirely by nonresident distance learning using flexible non-traditional methods of study and assessment. Visit the School here.
Amos
Bronson Alcott Center for Educational Research
Arnold
Harris Mathew Center for the Study of the Independent Sacramental
MovementCSISM is the first university center anywhere in the world to be devoted to the study of the independent sacramental movement originating within Catholicism. Visit CSISM here.
Romantic Discoveries Recordings
RDR operates as a research center in association with EAU. Since its inception, RDR has researched unknown piano music of the nineteenth-century and brought it to the public by means of a series of première CD recordings that now encompasses over one hundred works. Visit RDR at its own website here.
Libertarian Library Online Project
Society for Humanistic Potential
Henselt Library
- rare
scores of piano music
from the nineteenth-century
Virtual Library